DOI :https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1

A new model of human wellbeing is emerging to guide humanity in the Anthropocene. In essence, it recognises that wellbeing depends on enabling every person to lead a life of dignity and opportunity, while safeguarding the integrity of Earth’s life-supporting systems. The conceptual framework of social and planetary boundaries—which has come to be known as the Doughnut—contributes to this paradigm by concisely visualising its ambition (appendix), and so providing a compass for humanity’s 21st century progress.

Since I created the Doughnut at Oxfam in 2012,1

 it has been widely applied within academia, policymaking, progressive business, urban planning, and civil society as a tool for reconceptualising sustainable development.2 3 4 5 6

Here I present a renewed and strengthened framework, based on recent advances in both internationally agreed social standards and in Earth-system science, which respectively provide the basis for establishing the Doughnut’s social and ecological boundaries.

The Doughnut combines two concentric radar charts to depict the two boundaries—social and ecological—that together encompass human wellbeing (figure). The inner boundary is a social foundation, below which lie shortfalls in wellbeing, such as hunger, ill health, illiteracy, and energy poverty. Its twelve dimensions and their illustrative indicators are derived from internationally agreed minimum standards for human wellbeing, as established in 2015 by the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by all member states of the United Nations. 7

Figure thumbnail gr1
Figure Shortfalls and overshoot in the Doughnut Show full caption View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload (PPT)

The Doughnut’s outer boundary is an ecological ceiling, beyond which lies an overshoot of pressure on Earth’s life-supporting systems, such as climate change, ocean acidification, and biodiversity loss. Its nine dimensions and their indicators are defined by the planetary boundaries framework, which seeks to identify and safeguard critical processes that regulate Earth’s ability to sustain Holocene-like conditions, and this framework was likewise revised in 2015. 8

Between these two sets of boundaries lies an ecologically safe and socially just space in which all of humanity has the chance to thrive (appendix).

By quantifying and visualising the global scale of shortfalls and overshoot, the Doughnut acts as a concise compass for assessment of the current state of human wellbeing (the appendix contains the full data and methods).

Millions of people currently lead lives that fall far short of the social foundation’s internationally agreed minimum standards, ranging from nutrition and health care to housing, income, and energy. At the same time, human activity has led to overshoot for at least four planetary boundaries: climate change, biodiversity loss, nitrogen and phosphorus loading, and land conversion. Improving humanity’s wellbeing this century depends on eliminating this social shortfall and ecological overshoot simultaneously (figure).

The Doughnut raises four key implications for the pursuit of human wellbeing in the Anthropocene. First, it highlights the dependence of human wellbeing on planetary health. The Holocene is the only epoch in Earth’s history in which it is known that humanity can thrive. 9

The best chance of enabling a life of dignity and opportunity for more than 10 billion people over the coming century therefore depends on sustaining Holocene-like conditions, such as a stable climate, clean air, a protective ozone layer, thriving biodiversity, and healthy oceans. Second, the concurrent extent of social shortfall and ecological overshoot reflects deep inequalities—of income and wealth, of exposure to risk, of gender and race, and of political power—both within and between countries. The Doughnut helps to focus attention on addressing such inequalities when both theorising and pursuing human wellbeing. Third, the Doughnut implies the need for a deep renewal of economic theory and policymaking so that the continued widespread political prioritisation of gross domestic product growth is replaced by an economic vision that seeks to transform economies, from local to global, so that they become regenerative and distributive by design, and thus help to bring humanity into the Doughnut.10

Last, the Doughnut might act as a 21st century compass, but the greater task is to create an effective map of the terrain ahead. Thanks to ongoing socioecological systems research, this century is likely to be the first in which humanity begins more fully to understand and appreciate the complex interdependence of human wellbeing and planetary health.

I received a grant from The Kendeda Fund to write and promote my book, Doughnut Economics: seven ways to think like a 21st century economist, on which this comment is based. I thank Richard King (Chatham House, London, UK) for data assistance, Christian Guthier (All is Possible, Oxford, UK) for graphic design, and Sarah Cornell (Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm, Sweden), Ingo Fetzer(Stockholm Resilience Centre), Katherine Trebeck (Oxfam GB, Glasgow, UK), and Guido Schmidt-Traub (UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Paris, France) for valuable comments.

Supplementary Material
References
    • Raworth K
    A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut?.https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/dp-a-safe-and-just-space-for-humanity-130212-en.pdf Date: 2012(accessed Feb 20, 2017).View in Article 
    • Dearing J Wang R Zhang K et al.
    Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems.Glob Environ Change. 2014; 28: 227-238 View in Article 
    • Costanza R Alperovitz A Daly HE et al.
    Building a sustainable and desirable economy-in-society-in-nature, United Nations Division for Sustainable Development.https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Building_a_Sustainable_and_Desirable_Economy-in-Society-in-Nature.pdf Date: 2012(accessed Feb 20, 2017).View in Article 
  1. Article 13. Planetary boundaries and social thresholds: how do companies measure up? A practitioner’s perspective.http://www.article13.com Date: 2016 (accessed Feb 20, 2017).View in Article 
    • City Think Space
    Kokstad and Franklin integrated sustainable development plan.https://issuu.com/city_think_space/docs/kisdp_final_report Date: 2012(accessed Feb 20, 2017).View in Article 
    • Sayers M Trebeck K
    The UK doughnut: a framework for environmental sustainability and social justice.http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550 Date: 2015(accessed Feb 20, 2017).View in Article 
    • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs
    Sustainable development goals.https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 (accessed Feb 20, 2017).View in Article 
    • Steffen W Richardson K Rockström J et al.
    Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.Science. 2015; 347: 736 View in Article 
    • Rockström J Steffen W Noone K et al.
    Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity.Nature. 2009; 461: 472-475 View in Article 
    • Raworth K
    Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st century economist.Penguin Random House, London 2017 View in Article 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1

Copyright

© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

User License

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) | 

How you can reuse Information Icon

ScienceDirect

Access this article on ScienceDirect

Figures
  • Figure thumbnail gr1Figure Shortfalls and overs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s